MTN Group CEO Ralph Mupita told investors he sees “a material home opportunity of 20 to 30 million homes connected by MTN” over the next five years. The announcement arrived with the certainty of a headline. But Africa’s largest telecoms group is not simply promising connectivity — it is making an implicit claim about capital allocation, unit economics, and competitive displacement. The number deserves not celebration but scrutiny.
The Maths: Is 30 Million Homes Credible?
The credibility question begins with technology. Connecting 30 million homes via fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) would require trenching last-mile cable at costs ranging from $400 to $1,500 per home passed, depending on urban density and terrain. At the lower end, 30 million homes represents a $12 billion infrastructure bill — roughly MTN Group’s entire annual service revenue for 2025. The number is not achievable on that technology curve alone.
Fixed wireless access (FWA) changes the equation materially. Rather than laying fibre to each property, FWA delivers broadband by mounting a small receiver — customer premises equipment, or CPE — to an existing mobile network tower. At African scale, CPE per home runs $50–150. Deployment is faster, the installation team smaller, and the incremental infrastructure cost substantially lower because MTN already operates 5G and 4G sites across its major markets.
The arithmetic holds if FWA is the primary technology — which is precisely what Mupita signalled when he said the company will use “the right technology that will generate the right economics.” MTN’s Ambition 2030 strategy designates Home as one of three core verticals alongside individual connectivity and business services, and the proof-of-concept is already running.
In Nigeria, MTN’s FibreX home broadband service grew 658 percent in a single year, reaching 89,441 subscribers by January 2026 from fewer than 12,000 a year earlier. MTN Nigeria’s total home broadband subscriber base stands at 4.2 million. The company targets 8 million homes passed and 3 million FibreX-connected by 2028 in Nigeria alone — implying the group’s 20–30 million target will require similar execution in South Africa, Ghana, Uganda, and other operational markets simultaneously.
MTN Nigeria’s capital expenditure reached ₦1 trillion ($715 million) in 2025, a capex intensity of 19.3 percent, with roughly 87 percent directed at growth initiatives including network expansion and fibre rollout. The Huawei partnership announced at MWC 2026 — MTN and Huawei’s memorandum of understanding covering 5G AI-network infrastructure and the Alpha antenna systems already deployed in Ghana (see BETA-334) — is directly relevant here. Bulk equipment agreements of this kind reduce per-site and per-home CPE costs, improving FWA unit economics across MTN’s network footprint.
MTN Fixed Broadband: Market Targets
| Market | Technology | Target | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | FibreX (FTTH + FWA) | 3M connected homes | 2028 |
| Nigeria | FibreX homes passed | 8M | 2028 |
| South Africa | FWA + fibre | Not yet disclosed | 2030–31 |
| Ghana | FWA (5G-enabled) | Not yet disclosed | 2030–31 |
| Group | FWA + FTTH (mixed) | 20–30M connected homes | 2030–31 |
Sources: MTN Group investor call (March 2026), Technext24, MTN Nigeria investor relations
The Revenue Case: Implied ARPU
The financial case requires a specific revenue-per-home assumption. If MTN connects 30 million homes at an average $20 per month — below Starlink’s Nigerian residential plan of ₦57,000 ($39/month) — the annual home broadband revenue exceeds $7 billion. That represents more than half of MTN Group’s current annual service revenue of approximately R218 billion ($12 billion at current exchange rates).
The comparison with MTN’s mobile ARPU matters. Group ARPU grew 18.3 percent year-on-year in constant currency through 2025, with Nigeria’s ARPU rising 38.6 percent following tariff increases. But Africa-wide mobile ARPU remains in the $3–6 per month range. Home broadband at $20 would generate four to six times the revenue per customer relationship. For a company managing the tension between fixed broadband investment and a $2 billion M&A war chest targeting fintech (see BETA-366), home broadband’s ARPU advantage is precisely why the two capital programmes are more likely parallel lines than competing ones. MTN Nigeria alone spent $715 million on capex last year; the home broadband programme does not need to crowd out acquisitions — it needs to justify its own return.
Who Gets Disrupted?
If MTN executes at scale, the disruption to fixed broadband incumbents is specific and geographically concentrated.
In Kenya, Safaricom Home Fibre already demonstrates what competitive pressure looks like. The operator holds 36.5 percent of the country’s fixed internet market with 678,118 customers and charges KES 2,999 ($23) per month for entry-level 15 Mbps service. In August 2025, Safaricom cut home fibre prices by 25 percent in direct response to Starlink. MTN does not operate in Kenya — but the price-cutting dynamic illustrates the competitive discipline any fixed-line incumbent faces when a well-capitalised, infrastructure-heavy operator can price aggressively from day one. For markets where MTN does operate alongside established ISPs, the pattern is instructive.
Liquid Intelligent Technologies, Africa’s largest independent fibre network with over 110,000 kilometres of cable and around 95,000 homes passed across 14 countries, primarily serves East and Southern African enterprise markets — Uganda, Zambia, Rwanda, South Africa — where MTN also operates. Its 250,000 enterprise and broadband customers represent a relatively thin residential base atop a vast wholesale backbone. If MTN routes FWA deployments over Liquid’s underlying infrastructure, the relationship is complementary. If MTN invests in its own last-mile connectivity, Liquid’s enterprise broadband margins come under pressure from the largest mobile operator in the markets it serves.
Airtel Africa is the most direct strategic parallel. The company expanded its fibre network to 81,500 kilometres by December 2025, raised capex by 32.2 percent to $603 million, and has flagged home broadband as one of six strategic pillars. Airtel has simultaneously signed a satellite connectivity partnership with SpaceX to extend coverage to underserved areas — an approach that treats mobile as the primary platform and satellite as a coverage gap-filler, rather than fixed broadband as a distinct high-ARPU vertical.
Two Visions of Africa’s Connectivity Future
The MTN-Airtel contrast is more than a competitive positioning story. It frames a genuine structural question about where the value in African connectivity will ultimately sit. MTN is wagering that the home — treated as a distinct commercial relationship with its own product stack and ARPU profile — is the next vertical worth owning. Airtel is wagering that mobile data remains the primary connectivity platform, with satellite filling geographic gaps rather than replacing the mobile-first product architecture.
Geography may determine which thesis wins in each market. Starlink’s inability to operate legally in South Africa under current local-ownership regulations hands MTN a protected fixed broadband market in its largest revenue base. In Nigeria, Starlink’s residential plan at ₦57,000 ($39) per month — which users pay because no comparable alternative at that speed tier exists — defines the price ceiling MTN’s FWA product must comfortably beat to win at scale. It also defines the size of the commercial opportunity: a household currently paying $39 for Starlink would almost certainly accept $20–25 from an operator with local infrastructure, existing customer relationships, and bundled mobile plans.
The SME Layer
The stakes extend beyond household streaming. As BETAR reported in our satellite internet price war analysis (BETA-273), the arrival of Starlink across 26 African countries and Amazon Leo’s pending entry have already compressed pricing across the SME connectivity market. MTN’s push into fixed broadband — if it reaches 30 million homes on a five-year horizon — would add a third forcing function: a mobile-native operator with sunk infrastructure costs, a clear ARPU incentive, and a Huawei supply chain agreement reducing equipment costs. For small businesses currently paying $40–80 per month for reliable broadband, a well-priced FWA product from their existing mobile operator is the connectivity tier that removes the last serious friction point.
The question is no longer whether African households will get broadband-grade connectivity. It is which institution will own that relationship — and at what price. MTN is placing the largest single bet on that answer in the continent’s history.
— Technology Reporter, BETAR.africa